Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Myspace button
Youtube button

It’s All in the Wrapping – Marketing Condoms for Under-Sized Peckers

Bjorn | Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010 | 12 Comments »

Size is important

Here’s a fact to chew on: 45 % of men ‘fess up to wearing a condom that did not fit them in the last three months. Before you get all riled up about how irresponsible this is, understand the pressure that is on both males and the condom industry.  Just like the “no idea is a bad idea” mantra in conventional brainstorming, “no penis is a small penis” seems to be the enduring anthem of the condom industry.

Think about it: What condom manufacturer in their right mind is going to call one of their sizes “small”?  As Menachem Kaiser in “The Challenge of Marketing Small Condoms” (The Atlantic) puts it, “There are products where smallness is a marketing virtue, like cellphones or thong underwear. But small condoms are a marketing nightmare.” The article points out that the closest a condom manufacturer comes to indicating size is the carefully-worded “Snugger Fit” marketed by LifeStyles.

The confusion around condom sizing and the cultural pressure to avoid admitting to anything less than a crankshaft of a penis has obvious sexual health repercussions. Kaiser says of those men who admitted to wearing badly-fitting sheaths: “The misfits were significantly more likely to report breakage and slippage, along with difficulty reaching orgasm, both for their partners and for themselves, and a host of other sexual mishaps. Not surprisingly, men with ill-fitting condoms were more likely to take them off before sex was even over — all of which adds up to a massive failure for the one job a condom exists to fulfill.”

So how do you market minus-sized condoms to a “size matters”, “bigger is better” culture? You lie. Kaiser points out that Dr. Bill Yarber, of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction in Indiana, recommends re-labeling small condoms as “large”, regular as “extra-large” and so on.  Of course, as Kaiser points out, this invites ridiculous confusion and, “Yarber’s plan would have the true-to-life Magnum man in a pinch: his previously large-enough condoms would suddenly be a tight fit.”

Other options include spray-on condoms that are too much drama/time.  Also, vendors like TheyFit offer 70 different sizes that virtually guarantee a match for each man, but this craves some time-sensitive measuring and, Kaiser notes, “The site thoughtfully warns, ‘Watch out for paper cuts!’ ”

In a follow-up article to Kaiser’s, Judy Berman in Salon wrote,Shocker: Small Condoms Don’t Sell”. Berman’s conclusion: “…perhaps what needs to change, if we really want our protection to protect us, isn’t whether we call a condom ‘small’ or ‘large’ so much as our own harsh judgments about guys’ penis size.”  But let’s be real, we’ve gone for untold millennia pontificating on penises and that is as likely to change as is the size of the male ego.

LEAVE A COMMENT

BECOME A FAN OF CULTUREMUTT ON FACEBOOK

Bjorn Karlman

Related Articles:

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

  • Share/Bookmark

12 Comments

  • At 2010.03.03 11:28, Kirk said:

    They should borrow a page from the Starbucks playbook, and label them as “tall, grande, and venti”.

    On a somewhat related note: http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_14492641

    • At 2010.03.03 15:53, Bjorn said:

      Wow… quite the related note.

      And the Starbucks term suggestion DID come up in my research/reading…

    • At 2010.03.03 16:28, David said:

      A problem I am proud to say I never had. ha.

      • At 2010.03.03 18:16, Bjorn said:

        so how DOES the spray-on option work?

        • At 2010.03.03 22:42, David said:

          lol. I never heard of that. Thanks for the FYI. That sounds like a joke.

          • At 2010.03.04 09:39, Bjorn said:

            Yeah, my thing with this option is, what if you miss a spot?

      • At 2010.03.04 14:21, ... said:

        Quite the conundrum for their marketing department. I like the Starbucks idea listed above of “big, bigger, grand daddy of all!” But why not just publish size…length/girth. Let’s be honest now, what guy hasn’t measured it…just for fun!

        • At 2010.03.04 14:38, Bjorn said:

          haha… well it looks like current culture would catch on quick and everyone, including micro penis man would still claim grand daddy of all status and we’d be back to our current dilemma…

        • At 2010.03.06 01:52, Amanda said:

          Bjorn, honestly was this blog inspired by a conversation you had with a blonde and burnette several weeks ago at Barnes & Noble?

          • At 2010.03.07 13:38, Bjorn said:

            really tied in well with Judy Berman’s Salon article!

          • At 2010.03.08 12:01, tristan said:

            I think it was a few years back, the clothing industry changed all the sizes in the other direction for the sake of chubby americans. So now, if you say your a large, it means you have a big belly but are tiny in the pants????

            • At 2010.03.08 14:05, Bjorn said:

              without a doubt… which is why all condom purchases will go online in no time…

            (Required)
            (Required, will not be published)